|
TheNewLowNewsShow (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
check out our take on recent stem cell news some americans are paying attention watch?v=XDVSRxaz0gk
antiaudist (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Wow! You God?? Shall we worship you since you have determined life starts at 4 months? Wait, anyone believe life starts earlier than 4 months? Maybe we should worship him/her? As for me, I will take the biblical view. Something to think about: if God is for sure, then you've got real problem. But if God is not real, then no real loss, heh?
supermatrices (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Instead of focusing on minimizing defects by reducing pollutants, dioxin, pesticides, they have opted to research and use stem cells. What a strange way to patch for problems?! We need to acknowledge our faulty decisions and regroup. Why is it that these defects can be moderated using wild plant genetics and because of this the plants are being modified? Nonscientists and religious leaders are unable to make a totally informed decision.
BoyGenteel (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
"Pareer"? Max, I apparently understand this issue much more than you do, having researched it for seven or eight years. I can also distinguish animal life -- including embryonic human animal life -- from a mineral. You're guilty of bringing religion into a debate when losing the debate on science. You don't need to be Catholic or even believe in God at all to understand that human embryos are human beings, just as you and I are. Nice job changing the subject, Max.
max10wonderboy (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
your pareer dosent affect me. millions of biologist like me share the same opinion. Do reserach and you ll see it. Different opinions make people grow and reflect, that is why i am talking to you. But since you try to offend me, this is the end of the conversation. Mine was a criticism towards the Church. In your ethics is more right that someone dies of cancer or stay on a wheel chair or has daily pian rather then destroying a ball of cells for cure diseases. End of the conversation.
BoyGenteel (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
The Catholic Church is also against throwing your four-year-old daughter out of a moving helicopter. Should we be for something simply because the Catholic Church opposes it?If you really equate a young embryonic human being to a piece of iron, then I know that you're not really a biologist.
max10wonderboy (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
because the Catholic church is against abortions and destruction of an embryo. The Church is also against condoms, and even hybrid cells composed by animal's embroys and human genetic code. An embryo has 90% to become a life but it is not totally sure. For me the life of an human starts at the 4 months of pregancy, before that we are not different from a piece of iron.
BoyGenteel (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
What does religion, may I ask, have to do with this? If you're against parents beating their born children, then you should also oppose parents having their unborn children killed, as we know that, scientifically, human embryos are human beings.
aquaamant (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
This should've been the reply to Max10wonderboy's quote... Don't know why this ended up here.. x) "Many of them are frozen and some catholic government prefered to thorw them in the trash rather to find cures. The world is also overpopulate."
aquaamant (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
With embryonic stem cell research for medicine at such infant stage, pushing blindly toward the research without considering its ethical implication with other groups will only lead to greater social division. Because whether you like it or not, not all people who determine whether or not a cure can be used universally are scietists. There are ethicist, lawyers, politicians and sometimes even religious official, whose opinions are weighed as much as the opinions of the scientists. |
