brokeneconomy (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Agree, and the guy that added the bubles made it lamer.

joeygladsaget (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

i like this song but this video is absurdly lame

ChupopteraXXX (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

i think that the stupidest person here are you, because the senseless comment you made

gilb1112 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

ur stupid so go fuck ur self and die hahahhahahnot realy but fuck off!!!

usgcorp (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

go cartman

ChupopteraXXX (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

this song is stupid

puacino (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Great song!

selatik1 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

blobo: Haven't heard everything by Palmer, so if u have ideas of his "original" performances, please tell me. If Palmer's so much more original/faster than Peart, what use is that if Palmer can't maintain a steady tempo? I mean, how can you overlook something so basic as tempo? It's a big part of a drummer's job.I'm a bassist, and I'm sure many other musicians out there will agree with me that nothing is more irritating than a drummer who can't keep steady time. There's your lesson in logic.

blobo123 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

i seriously think that you need a lesson in logic and argument.youve mixed up the seperate arguments of palmer/peart comparison and quantizing.fYOURi,,,I did NOT say that Peart needed quantization, more that its common in recent recordings. whether he does so or not i do not know, nor do i care.the comparison between palmer and peart was not about timekeeping, more that palmer's drum parts were more original and MUCH faster and complex than anything peart has played.

tyreseburn (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

wtf are you talking about?