|
fuel7from7water (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
this is a test comment. I have been trying to reply for MONTHS, and as the one who was granted permission by NBC to post this video, I am making one last attempt to post. If this doesn't work, I will make other attempts to contact, Google.
john29302 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
why do i fel pimped out by a fellow hhoer? lets see some torque from an ice...we will let you use 240 volt wall socket...lets see some form of progress instead of smoke and mirror pomp and parade. you got the money...oh yeah its a security issue for your r and d. bullshit get off that greed racket and show us progress ...i will be at the hho games and want to more than snake oil..you better not be pissin on real scientist that dont have your money but you have the PR so reflect something real
ArtificialCleverenAI (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
See watch?v=cRw_h5gjQ9s . "HHO" generation is always a lossy process, making it impossible to create a fuel. To generate energy you need a nuclear reaction, which is possible at low temperature. Search for "The War Against Low Temperature Fusion" and LERN (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction). It is not beyond the realm of suitably equipped enthusiasts to produce positive energy gains with this technique. We stand on the verge of a frontier if this HHO silliness is abandoned in pursuit of real science.
ghostjaguar (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Resonant Frequency, They key to braking the Hydrogen bonds is to vibrate them apart rather then try to brake them.Regardless of this however.The average car requires 10kw to move at 100km/h, but it burns an average of 10L of fuel, which is around 140kw of energy, If you think that the I.C.E. can be made green by running on water, the only thing you'll end up with is a water shortage. People think outside the box, hanging on to 100yr old technology is not the way to enter the future.
victor2cutube (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
this was made awhile back I guess.. doubt if it will ever get to the market like all the other HHO systems.. all those companies want is to hide the inventions to protect oil & gas profits.
SPACEDMADNESS42 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
regardless of that, H2O is way better then Oil, more of it burns which in turn means more power will be made out of a gallon. Even if it costs more to make then you get from it, it's a hell of a lot better the having oil spills all over the place, dirty air, dirty water, and paying way too much for something so damaging to our planet. You also must know this is on demand processing and burning of H2O. unlike old methods which the oil companies wanted to sell liquid hydrogen in, this is better.
SPACEDMADNESS42 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You are the kind of people that are responsible for slowing the economy to the point to where living costs are five times our income. Oil companies make record profits every year, while we go in debt because of it, we need change and we need it today, not in 60 years, we will all be dead in 60 year if we keep using oil. Suck on them apples, you are negative towards getting everyone off of oil, in that light you are a traitor to our efforts and you will feel like an ass when we all have H2O.
klezfire (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You do not put water in the gas tank, its a separate unit. Search HHO...
marklug (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You must not have seen my table top machine. It produces about 2 liters of hho gas a minute and will run for an hour off a 12 V battery with no charging apparatus. It is enough to power my torch. Having problems with flashback though. I do have an arrestor installed. But I think it is a problem with nozzle size and config.
Smeddog1 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
of coarse no credit given to Stan Meyers , the inventer of the fuel cell for hho powered car. Oh no , they are gonna steal all the credit. Well I know who the real pioneer is. RIP Stan Meyers |
