|
AprendeConHubby (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
epic
SPARTAN021 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Well, I just concluded that you are nitpicking simply because of the fact that you dismissed a logical explanation of why he showed it as 66.6% and not 66.7%. That´s sorta like saying "Nay, ´tis not well enough for my person. Take theine explanation away!"And that´s nitpicking!
GFl1ve (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
How would you draw that conclusion? I'm nitpicking which would suggest I like things to be correct which would suggest very rational.I already knew of this problem, when it was first proposed to me I said swap.
SPARTAN021 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Someone is in a nitpicking mood... Let me guess.. You didn´t swap?
leeds0united (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
the presenter souns like harry enfield
mewmewlova (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
should swap!! u have a higher chance!!in the beggining the chances are equally divided into 3 parts, however after the gameshow host has shown u 1 door, the chances ar now dinded into 2 parts, not 3.
bob1012112 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
god yes we know the .3 is recurring get the fuck over it jesus christ
bob1012112 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
god get over it
GFl1ve (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
The video said 66%, without the line -which is wrong.6.66...=67 When you round it off.
tl2e3le4f (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
to everyone that still believes it's 50/50.. you are wrong. it's funny how retards can't comprehend this simple problem even with these videos proving it. |