|
gingas666 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Humanity wants to invent "perpetum mobile" from ages. But there came the day then one "stupid" men was born. The men did said: "There is no way to break the low of conservation of energy!". That "stupid" men was Albert Einstein.Keep on working my friend ;)
joaquinveyron (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Ah, a dentist did this and this carburetor was tested?? By whom, by himself??? Ah, is that so??? Hihihihi .... I am sure, if YT 'd existed then, he would have tried to sell this crap there. I don't know how it is in the US, but in Europe you 'd throw a car which does not need oil, to the market as quickly as possible and nobody could them. Such a bullshit, but you are playing me, right??!
r00tcause (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
"I posted the last comment to your comment:" I am aware of that. I was speaking purely hypothetically about exotic ways people MAY find to siphon energy in the future that could APPEAR to be free-energy. "Is my English really this bad? What's wrong with it?" You could start by losing "hihi" as that is not english. You then follow with elipses(...)and dive right into the middle of a sentence starting with the word "and". This makes no grammatical sense. There are other issues I don't have room 4
CJurasin (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
joaq: You forget that the oil companies own ALOT of stock in many car companies! In the late 1950s in Tacoma (Washington) there was a Dentist (car hobbiest on the side) who invented a carboretor that (was tested) and was getting 60-75 MPG on a V8!. He tried distributing his carb and was quickly closed down. He was FORCED to sell his patent and the carb was then hushed up and SHELVED. The oil companies are FAR bigger than most people know, and will do ANYTHING to protect their investments.
joaquinveyron (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Is my English really this bad? What's wrong with it? "Hihi ... and then I would not see the reason why to believe why a Billy Bob hick like the guy in this video should be able, all in a sudden, to tap into "parallel" universes, while he is talking about "magnetic" engines, which are utter rubbish in itself. It is like trying to gain kinetic energy sustainably from rolling a ball downhill (which is not possible, because after a certain time you need to roll it uphill again)"
joaquinveyron (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I posted the last comment to your comment: "Yeah, he'll sell it next year. You can tell by the video quality that this video is MANY YEARS old already. It's always fun to laugh at over-unity claims though. For those reading, I do not care HOW you tweak something, you can never get more energy out than in. You might be able to tap zero point energy or siphon energy from a parallel universe or so other exotic idea but that's still NOT over-unity. The energy MUST come from somewhere."
r00tcause (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Yes and I have no idea why you are implying that I ever said this was real or that he was capable of "tapping into a parallel dimension". I was speaking hypothetically and your english is obviously bad so you've misinterpreted it all. I will speak this plain and clear. This is a scam, perpetual motion is not possible and I am fully aware of this fact.
joaquinveyron (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Hihi ... and then I would no see the reason to believe why a Billy Bob hick like the guy in this video should, all in a sudden, be able to tap into "parallel" universe and stuff, whereas he is talking about "magnetic" engines, which is utter rubbish in itself, it is like trying to gain kinetic energy sustainably from rolling a ball downhill (which is not possible, because at point of time you need to roll it uphill again)
joaquinveyron (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Which crap are you talking, the one in the video I only can assume?
r00tcause (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You're preaching to the choir man. Tell it to someone who believes this crap. :) |
