|
Vdude13 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You make a good point, but don't you think that regardless of the smallprint, most girls that read these magazines and look up to these media divas, will still want to achieve that image. And yes you can improve your physique with diet and exercise. But what about acne? Or wisdom lines (like they mention in the movie). It's not just boob enlargement. Things that you can't control. I mean some people as healthy as they are, have different body builds (hips, body fat) etc.
Vdude13 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I definetly think it should be banned because in a sense it is false advertisement. You are saying you can look like "this" if you do or take "this". And it's false. I mean I don't like the idea, but models and celebrities are like standards for society (what is beautiful what is not etc.) And when people retouch things they raise the bar to where it may be even unatainable.
RockerChickita (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
YES,I deffinatly think retouching should be banned because some people that do retouching make girls have bigger boobs and smaller hips yes popstars might want to look like they have the PERFECT FIGURE but if they r afraid of what people might think of them either its fat or shes so flat i personaly would care because making them have a bigger chest is degrating and sexist for men to look at!P.s im ONLY 11 so dont be that mean (ohh whatever say what u would like to say)PLEASE COMMENT BAC
engelsciria (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Thank god; someone who thinks rationally.
natashafortwis (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
it shouldnt be bannend, but people shuold just be aware that the picture(s) have been photo shopped/altered. like maybe if its a magezeen they could just put in small letters on it somewhere that says=some pictures may be altered/photo shopped. what's prettier is girls with big butts, arms, and legs, that's acheived thru lots of food n exersize, muscles with some fat on them, not so much fat to make cellulite or saggyness, but enough fat so that they're not really defined or veiny.
Cruton117 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
there is nothing wrong with that girl
Slapmastaoffunk (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Photoshopping may sell products, magazines, etc., but saying the unattainable is possible causes so much hurt in society
trackstar789 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
they are not changing eyesores into attrative girls, they are changing attrative girls into picture of perfection
Redeyetom (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
It easier said then done. Most of us here just want to see the beauty in life not the ugly side of it.Photoshop is just making photo we want to see.
chicagobuilt (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I say just leave it to the NATURALLY attractive people. |
