jaredslogin (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

god damned right. But ron paul talks too radically for the sheeple to now be afraid of him. Every time he opened his mouth in one of these debates he sounded like a a crazy cat lady. I love ron paul, but he needs to tone it down if he ever wants to win the hearts of the american sheeple. I saw an interview he did in like 1988 where he was really quiet and calm and i guess he's super pissed now because since then we've fucked up ALOT. Just as the idiots reelected bush, so have they elected Obama.

5217063 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

How did the Iraq War prevent anything??? They weren't a threat whatsoever! they had no weapons that could reach us.

RIEKSONE (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

obama wants to increase the size of goverment what kind of change is that

texanpilot23 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Obama has credits.. he has none!! he has 0 experience as a leader of anything other than being a community organizer.. he voted present instead of yes or no 80% of the time as a state senator.. he has no major piece of legislation that he-helped pass asa u.s senator.. he is the most liberal member of congress.. he has never worked with a republican to get anything done.. he surrounds himself with socialists.. he has been wrong about the surge and other foreign policy issues.. hes not ready

Fritzane (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Are you talking of Ron Paul now or Obama and Mc Cain.Obama ofcourse is the man to be in the oval office.He has all the credits for his judgements and view of change.

saltyrage (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

I just love how the candidates all smirk at each other's comments.

bluespaceoddity (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

They spent quite a bit of time talking about the Bush Doctrine. Do you think Sarah Palin watched any of these debates?

texanpilot23 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

obama? Ron Paul is the only person who offers real change

zar911 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

its funny where in a political debate that could possibly decide the fate of this country, that there's a big fat facebook logo behind the question guys chair.

wimscheers (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Insanity. Complete Insanity. World Military Spending 1,200,000,000,000 USA583,283,000,000 = 48% 48 PEOPLE. You don't need a bigger army. When it doesn't work with this one, it will NEVER work. Let's face it Iraq: 1,008,000,000 You have an army that's 578 times better financed then theirs. Failing has NOTHING to do with the size of your army. It's the policy that's failing, the attitude. You ran em over like everybody expected and f*ed it up ever since.